CFP Rankings: Miami leads, but Alabama and Ohio State placements spark debate
The selection committee’s first poll of the season places the Hurricanes at No. 1 while ranking the Crimson Tide ahead of their recent victims and dropping the Buckeyes to No. 12.
By Kofi Costa ·

Notre Dame finished 11th in the first College Football Playoff rankings released Tuesday, placing the Irish seven spots lower than their standing in the Associated Press Top 25. The ranking puts the Fighting Irish in a precarious position as the final team that would qualify for the postseason if the tournament began immediately. Their path to a guaranteed berth now hinges on a Saturday matchup against the No. 1 Miami Hurricanes. A loss to Miami could see them drop further given the committee’s assessment of their schedule.
Miami earned the top seed in the committee’s initial evaluation. Georgia, with a 7-1 record, secured the No. 2 spot, followed by undefeated Utah in third. The committee’s choices diverge sharply from the AP poll in the middle of the board. Defending champion Indiana sits at No. 4, eight positions above Ohio State. The Buckeyes, who defeated the Hoosiers 19-15 in October, have since lost quarterback Julian Sayin and another game, contributing to their slide.
Alabama’s placement at No. 5 drew scrutiny from observers. The Crimson Tide, currently 6-2, are ranked eight spots ahead of Tennessee, despite having lost to the Vols by 16 points recently. Kentucky holds the No. 6 seed, with Texas at No. 7. UCLA, the only other undefeated team in the nation, is ranked eighth. The committee’s hierarchy suggests a prioritization of perceived program strength and recent form over direct head-to-head results in certain tiers.
Hunter Yurachek, chair of the selection committee, addressed the controversy surrounding these placements during the post-rankings press conference. He described Notre Dame as a "very, very good football team" but noted the lack of a signature win against teams ahead of them. The Irish’s only loss came 28-24 at BYU on Oct. 17. Yurachek clarified that head-to-head matchups do not influence the rankings unless the teams are within the same four-team pod. This rule explains why Alabama’s loss to Tennessee did not force a swap between the two schools, as Tennessee lacks the depth of quality wins to justify the higher ranking.
Ohio State’s drop to No. 12 was attributed largely to defensive performance rather than the transition to freshman quarterback Luke Fahey. The committee focused on the Buckeyes’ 30-18 defeat by USC, a team that has not impressed many analysts. Boise State, ranked 25th, would receive the automatic Group of Six bid if the field were set today, leaving Ohio State out of the mix. The committee also noted Alabama’s September win against Mississippi State, a team that has since fallen to a 2-4 record following a key injury.
The SEC’s representation in the top 25 reflects its depth, with 10 teams making the list. The conference accounts for 13 of the nation’s 20 toughest schedules, a factor the committee weighed heavily. In contrast, the ACC is represented primarily by Miami and Wake Forest. The Demon Deacons are ranked 16th with a one-loss record, a result of their defeat at the hands of Miami. They remain in control of their postseason destiny, with a potential rematch against the Hurricanes in the conference title game.
This is the first of six weekly rankings to be released before the final field is set on Dec. 6. The playoffs will begin with quarterfinal games on Dec. 18 and 19 at the campuses of the No. 5 through No. 8 seeds. The national championship game is scheduled for Jan. 25 in Las Vegas. The committee expects movement in the rankings following Saturday’s games, which include critical matchups that could reshape the top of the table.
Projected matchups if the playoffs started today include No. 12 Boise State hosting No. 5 Alabama and No. 11 Notre Dame visiting No. 6 Kentucky. No. 10 Ole Miss would face No. 7 Texas, a team that defeated the Rebels 31-24 on Oct. 24. No. 9 BYU would travel to No. 8 UCLA. These hypothetical pairings illustrate the complexity of the current field, where historical rivalries and recent results do not always align with the committee’s final decisions.





